Training and motivation of biomedical journal editors: keys to addressing an ongoing challenge

Abstract

Andes Pediatrica/Revista Chilena de Pediatría (AP/RCHP) is undergoing a continuous process of professionalization of its editorial team.

Objective: To determine the motivation and training needs of AP/RCHP editors.

Methodology: Exploratory qualitative study. A semi-structured guideline was applied to a focus group of AP/RCHP editors. Content analysis was based on pre-established categories: motivation, barriers and facilitators for editor performance, training needs, and proposals for improvement.

Results: Six editors participated, with a median age of 57.5 years (interquartile range

[IQR] 48.3-62.0), five of whom were female and five were pediatricians. Median time as an editor was 4.5 years (IQR 1.8-5.8) with an average dedication of 2 hours per week (IQR 1.3-2.0). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivations were identified. Continuous learning stood out as the main motivator. Among the obstacles to performance as an editor, limited time, workload, and difficulty in finding reviewers were mentioned. The increase in the flow of manuscripts and their complexity was seen as a challenge. There was agreement on the importance of training reviewers to optimize the quality of the editorial process, and the support of more experienced editors was valued. For a training plan, research methodology, the use of artificial intelligence-based editorial tools, academic writing, ethical issues and creation of graphs and figures were prioritized.

Conclusions: AP/RCHP editors reported high motivation for their work. Barriers and facilitators to working as an editor were recognized. Areas requiring a training plan to strengthen the editorial team were identified.