Lung mechanics in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome associated to acute COVID-19 and MIS-C

Visual abstract

PDF (Español (España))
Material Suplementario (Español (España))
PDF
Supplementary Material

Keywords

PARDS
COVID-19
MIS-C
Pulmonary Mechanics
Driving Pressure
Critical Care
Pneumonology
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Respiratory Function Tests
Covid-19 Pandemics

How to Cite

1.
Domínguez-Rojas J, Coronado Munoz Álvaro, Luna-Delgado Y, Alvarado-Gamarra G, Quispe Flores G, Caqui-Vilca P, Atamari-Anahui N, Muñoz Ramírez CM, Tello-Pezo M, Cruces P, Vásquez-Hoyos P, Díaz F. Lung mechanics in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome associated to acute COVID-19 and MIS-C. Andes pediatr [Internet]. 2023 Jun. 15 [cited 2025 Dec. 28];94(3):350-6. Available from: https://andespediatrica.cl/index.php/rchped/article/view/4616

Cited by


Abstract

Objective: To describe lung mechanics in Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (PARDS) associated with acute COVID-19 and MIS-C with respiratory failure. 

Methods: A concurrent multicenter observational study was performed, analyzing clinical variables and pulmonary mechanics of PARDS associated with COVID-19 in 4 Pediatric intensive care units (PICU) in Peru. The subgroup analysis included PARDS associated with multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C), MIS-PARDS, and PARDS with COVID-19 primary respiratory infection, C-PARDS. In addition, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis for mortality and lung mechanics was performed. 

Results: 30 patients were included. The age was 7.5 (4-11) years, 60% were male, and mortality was 23%. 47% corresponded to MIS-PARDS and 53% to C-PARDS groups. C-PARDS had positive RT-PCR in 67% and MIS-PARDS none (p < 0.001). C-PARDS group had more profound hypoxemia (P/F ratio < 100, 86% vs. 38%, p < 0.01) and higher driving-pressure [14(10-22) vs 10(10-12) cmH2O], and lower compliance of the respiratory system (CRS) [0.5 (0.3-0.6) vs 0.7(0.6-0.8) ml/ kg/cmH2O] compared with MIS-PARDS (all p < 0.05). The ROC analysis for mortality showed that driving pressure had the best performance [AUC 0.91(95%CI0.81-1.00), with the best cut-off point of 15 cmH2O (100% sensitivity and 87% specificity). Mortality in C-PARDS was 38% and 7% in MIS-PARDS (p = 0.09). MV-free days were 12(0-23) in C-PARDS and 23(21-25) in MIS-PARDS (p = 0.02). 

Conclusion: Patients with C-PARDS have lung mechanics characteristics similar to classic moderate to severe PARDS. This was not observed in patients with MIS-C. As seen in other studies, a driving pressure ≥ 15 cmH2O was the best discriminator for mortality. These findings may help guide ventilatory management strategies for these two different presentations.

https://doi.org/10.32641/andespediatr.v94i3.4616
PDF (Español (España))
Material Suplementario (Español (España))
PDF
Supplementary Material

Los contenidos publicados en esta revista están protegidos bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0). Esto significa que cualquier persona es libre de compartir,  usar y construir a partir de este artículo, incluso con fines comerciales, siempre que se otorgue el crédito apropiado al autor original, se proporcione un enlace a la licencia, se indique el nombre y edición de la Revista.

Esta licencia no impone restricciones adicionales, lo que garantiza la libre circulación y reutilización del conocimiento con respeto y transparencia hacia los derechos de los autores.  (Véase El efecto del acceso abierto).