Mucopolysaccharidosis type II: a scoping review on how to assess this rare disease
PDF (versión preliminar) (Español (España))

Keywords

Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures
Follow-Up Studies
Genetic Testing
Mucopolysaccharidosis II
Rare Diseases

How to Cite

1.
Schmitt Schlindwein S, Barrozo Marrazzo E, Nunes Campos L, Argüelles CF, Fernandez Zelcer F, Stegmann C, Stegmann J, Gerk A. Mucopolysaccharidosis type II: a scoping review on how to assess this rare disease. Andes pediatr [Internet]. 2026 Feb. 18 [cited 2026 Apr. 15];97(2). Available from: https://andespediatrica.cl/index.php/rchped/article/view/5639

Cited by


Abstract

Mucopolysaccharidosis type II (MPS II), or Hunter syndrome, is a rare lysosomal storage disorder caused by pathogenic variants in the IDS gene. This condition has specific treatment; therefore, timely diagnosis and adequate follow-up are essential for optimizing patient outcomes.

Objective: To synthesize the available evidence on diagnostic and follow-up approaches for MPS II.

Methods: Scoping review of ten databases for articles published between 2017 and 2022. Studies involving human participants were included if they addressed diagnostic or follow-up methods for MPS II. We followed the PRISMA-ScR guidelines and conducted qualitative analysis and descriptive statistics to identify trends in diagnostic and follow-up practices.

Results: 31 articles were selected. Of these, 23 reported clinical findings, with most articles focusing on neurological (n = 17), skeletal and limbs (n = 16), and head and neck (n = 15) manifestations. Enzyme activity testing was the most reported diagnostic method, although the techniques used were frequently unspecified. Follow-up approaches included imaging studies, clinical assessments, and quality-of-life measurement scales. However, the lack of standardization in methodologies limits the generalizability of findings.

Conclusion: This review highlights the need for standardized diagnostic and follow-up protocols for MPS II. Greater transparency in reporting diagnostic methods and a consistent follow-up framework are critical to improving patient care and facilitating research comparisons.

https://doi.org/10.32641/andespediatr.v97i2.5639
PDF (versión preliminar) (Español (España))
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Revista Chilena de Pediatría